Improve what you have
- When
- One person or team needs a better form, view, template or configuration.
- Result
- Keep the existing tool and remove the immediate friction.
We map how the work happens, improve existing tools where possible and build only when that is the sensible answer.
This working quotation example shows the principle: collect information once, keep the status visible and leave the consequential decision with a person. It is a demonstration, not a claimed client result.
We choose the lightest dependable intervention. The review makes that choice explicit before a larger build is proposed.
Outside the first scopeUsually not a fit: speculative consumer apps, marketplaces without a tested operating model, or regulated, safety-critical and money-custody systems.
The paid review produces material you can use, including when the recommendation is not to hire Mavie for a build.
We examine one process with the people, tools, information and failure points that make it real.
Already have code or an AI-built prototype? The same first review becomes a Rescue Review.
The review gives later work an order. You do not choose these stages now, and no stage begins without its scope and price agreed in writing.
One important workflow, realistic test data and a private preview people can use.
The approved workflow becomes a secure, tested and ownable application.
Monitoring, recovery, updates and a named support route after launch.
The first review can recommend improving or buying existing software, a small automation, a custom build—or stopping. No build begins without a written scope, price for the agreed stage, recurring service costs and approval boundary.
A map of the current process and its failure points, the relevant users, data and dependencies, a comparison of realistic options, a proposed workflow or screen direction, and an indicative total budget with a fixed proposal for the agreed next step.
Automation connects a known trigger and action between tools you already use. Custom software is justified when several people need a shared record, roles, status, history or customer workspace that existing tools cannot provide cleanly.
The review establishes an indicative total budget and a fixed price for the agreed next stage. No build starts until the stage, price, third-party costs, ownership and circumstances that could change the price are written down.
Yes. The first step becomes a Rescue Review covering the code, deployment, data, access and the safest route forward. It may recommend retaining only part of what already exists.
The proposal states the exact terms. The normal direction is customer-owned accounts, exportable code and data, and no unnecessary dependence on Mavie.
We are not the right first partner for regulated, safety-critical or money-custody systems. We also avoid speculative consumer apps and marketplaces until the underlying service and operating model have been tested.
Describe who does the work now, what gets copied, chased or lost, and what a dependable result would change.
Book the review